The losing party (the defendant) is subject to certain terms ordered by the court when the claimant prevails in a civil action and achieves a judgement. This usually entails paying a certain amount of money, although it can also call for the defendant to obey an injunction or return property. Defendants, however, don’t always voluntarily follow court directions. In these situations, the claimant will have to take action to make the judgement enforceable.
The type of judgement and the defendant’s circumstances will determine the enforcement strategy. While monetary payments are frequently required of the defendant, enforcement may sometimes entail other measures like property seizure or the implementation of a performance order. To get the full amount owed, the claimant would occasionally need to employ a number of enforcement strategies.
There are various ways that civil judgements can be enforced within the UK legal system. Some of these techniques are:
Getting a writ or warrant of execution is one of the most popular ways to enforce a money judgement. This permits the defendant’s belongings to be seized and sold at auction by a bailiff in the County Court or an enforcement officer in the High Court. The judgement debt is then settled using the sale’s revenues.
The claimant may move the case to the High Court and request a writ of control if the court’s decision is for more than £600. For more substantial debts, High Court enforcement officers are a desirable alternative because they often possess greater authority and resources than County Court bailiffs. The claimant should take into account the higher costs associated with moving their case to the High Court.
The enforcement officer will visit the defendant’s property after the writ or warrant is issued to seize goods, which may include stock, valuable personal belongings, or automobiles. Certain objects are free from seizure, such as necessities for the home or instruments used in the defendant’s trade.
The claimant can use a charging order to enforce a judgement debt on the defendant’s real estate, including their house and land. The charging order prohibits the defendant from selling or remortgaging the property without first paying the judgement debt, but it does not require them to do so. The judgement debt is settled from the proceeds of the sale if the defendant decides to sell the property.
An order for sale may be requested by the claimant to compel the property’s sale. This is a different legal procedure, and before making such an order, the court will take into account a number of variables, including the defendant’s individual circumstances and the amount of equity in the property. When the defendant has valuable property but no funds to pay the judgement obligation right away, charging orders are very useful.
The claimant can obtain the judgement debt immediately from the defendant’s salary through the use of an attachment of earnings order. The employer of the defendant is directed by the court to withhold a certain amount from the defendant’s pay and forward it to the claimant until the debt is settled.
Earnings orders that are attached work well when the defendant is employed and makes a consistent salary. They do not, however, work if the defendant works for themselves, is jobless, or has previously been the target of another attachment of earnings order.
When determining how much should be withheld from the defendant’s pay, the court will consider their financial circumstances to make sure they have adequate cash for necessities. This could imply a lengthy repayment schedule, particularly in cases when the defendant has a low income.
The claimant can obtain payment for the judgement debt from a third party that owes the defendant money through the use of a third-party debt order, formerly known as a garnishee order. The most frequent use of this is to freeze and take possession of funds kept in the defendant’s bank account.
The bank must suspend the defendant’s account until the judgement debt is paid in full if the court issues a third-party debt order. Following, the court has a hearing to determine whether to release the claimant’s frozen cash. If the claim is granted, the money is given to the claimant to pay off the obligation.
When the defendant possesses a significant amount of money in their bank account or is owed money by another party, such a business client, third-party debt orders work well.
However, it may be challenging to identify and freeze the funds if the defendant has several accounts or frequently transfers money between them. The claimant may need to use this strategy in conjunction with other enforcement measures in certain situations.
The claimant may file for bankruptcy or wind up the defendant’s business if the defendant refuses to pay the judgement debt and the total amount outstanding exceeds £5,000 for individuals or £750 for firms. Since insolvency proceedings can have major consequences for the defendant and may not always result in full payment of the debt, they should only be utilised as a last resort.
The assets of the defendant are liquidated to satisfy all of their creditors, including the claimant, when a bankruptcy petition is approved. But before unsecured creditors like the claimant, secured creditors and some priority debts—including taxes and employee wages—are paid. This implies that, based on the defendant’s available assets, the claimant may only be able to recover a portion of the judgement obligation.
When a corporation goes through winding-up procedures, its assets are liquidated and the proceeds are divided among its creditors. Similar to filing for bankruptcy, there is no assurance that the claimant will get all of the money owed, but in cases where all avenues have been exhausted, it can be a useful approach to get some of the debt back.
Although the burden of starting enforcement proceedings rests with the claimant, the court is crucial in monitoring the procedure and guaranteeing its equitable execution. Most enforcement techniques require court approval, and in certain situations, the claimant might have to appear in person to defend a particular method.
If the defendant can show that they are unable to pay the obligation right now but are prepared to do so over time, the court may also choose to suspend enforcement. In these situations, the court may decide to give the defendant an extension of time to comply with the decision by ordering payments to be made in instalments or by granting a stay of execution.
A judgement’s enforcement is not always simple, and claimants may encounter a number of difficulties. One frequent problem is that the defendant can simply lack the resources to satisfy the judgement debt. In certain situations, the claimant might have to write off the debt as uncollectible because enforcement efforts might be ineffective.
Finding the defendant’s possessions presents another difficulty. The defendant may conceal their assets, move them to relatives, or open offshore accounts if they are determined not to pay the bill. In certain situations, the claimant might have to pursue further legal action to track down the assets and reclaim them under the court’s authority.
In civil litigation, enforcing a decision is an essential step in guaranteeing that the winning party gets their money back and that justice is done. For those looking to understand the best methods for enforcing court judgments in civil litigation UK, the legal system provides a variety of enforcement mechanisms, such as writs of execution and insolvency processes, each tailored to specific situations. But enforcement might be difficult, particularly if the defendant refuses to cooperate or doesn’t have the money to pay the obligation. To optimise their chances of victory, claimants should carefully assess the best enforcement strategy for their case and, if needed, obtain legal counsel.
Copyright © 2023 Adam Bernard Solicitors. This Firm is Authorised & Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority SRA NO: 598171, 656730.
